8/30/2023 0 Comments Steinberg nuendo 8Stems - If you are using sends or direct out to a paralell 7.1 (or greater) bus as the source for your stems, something that is required for all deliverables then the wav that is created from these busses will be the wrong order. Which brings me to point out another frustration with this unprofessional choice of Steinbergs. This seems a little unstable, but it might work. Then from from the renderer back into Nuendo throug the audio bridge, but at the same time sending it out to the Lynx for monitoring purposes. I’m trying to set up an aggregate i/o between the dolby audio bridge and the Lynx driver, so that you can have audio coming in from protools into Nuendo and send it to the renderer through dolby audio bridge. Using the dolby audio bridge to communicate from Nuendo to the renderer, disables the Lynx inputs into Nuendo as you can only use one core audio driver at a time in Nuendo. Steve - I just want to give you a quick update on the template, as it seems a bit more involved. I posted it here and while it has been read there have been no responses.Īs a retired tech I plan on testing both encoders (renderers) and see what the difference in performance there are. I got the email below from the tech setting up my new system. If they didn’t offer 100 side projects I think the PT crowd would realise how much -better- Cubase is as a product… and I think that would’ve encourage SB to do even better with it, instead of going off on all these goofy other deals.There seems to be no good answers only more complications. Because the thing is: the stuff they are good at, is MUCH better than the competition. Too many products with too many dead ends, instead of continuing to strengthen the 2-3 things they just -rule- at. A little more pressure (just a little) might not get us all the things we want, but it might keep SB a bit more focused-and if there’s one thing SB has lacked over the years, it’s FOCUS. I wish just a taste of the righteous indignation over there was still present here. The only real schadenfreude I feel? It’s kinda pleasant to know the Nuendo crowd can get just as annoyed as me… and I saved $2,000. Now, we have the worst of both worlds: SB devs are now 100% hidden and there is almost no tolerance for constructive grousing. And even more important? There were a certain # of forum participants and grousers who pushed SB and I believe that made a positive difference. And customers -expect- to be able to grouse.īack in the day (the Sparky forum), it was UGLY, but it was also a time when SB actually -interacted- with customers and that created the appearance of care. There, SB at least puts on a show of interest. My point is that the Nuendo forum is like the Merc dealership. (Well they used to before every Tom, Dick n Harry started leasing 'em.) But when ya go to the dealer? They treat ya like yer SPECIAL. Most of the features in the Merc? Never use 'em. Truth be told? No practical reason to own a Mercedes in the US v. People grouse about features now rather than showstopper bugs. C5.0 was relatively clean and so was C6.0… compared with SX and VST. It seems like, at some point around C4, SB really buckled down on the QC. I think Nuendo and Cubase are both now mature products. It seems like this is a real part of what you get for your money with Nuendo. This may sound like schadenfreude but I’m actually kinda jealous of the Nuendo community for one reason: They get to bitch. So why pay for a few high-end features I would rarely use (D/R excepted) when everything I’d use 9x% of the time is already there? It seems like SB ‘tests’ new features out on Cubase before foisting on the ‘pro’ Nuendo base. In fact, I stick with Cubase because it is traditionally -ahead- of Nuendo in terms of MIDI and various new features. And it’s probably easier to manage a HUGE audio interface-like 128 inputs… which is about 104 more than I’ll ever have.īut frankly, I can’t think of any -music- you could make with Nuendo that you couldn’t make as easy with Cubase. There are important differences from my POV, but I think they would -mainly- matter to people doing -very- complex audio mixes… as you’d have in a movie.ĭirect Routing comes to mind-which I would -love-, the automation write options are cooler and the connections to crazy expensive remote controllers are better I think. At the risk of appearing unhelpful… what is it you feel lacking in your Cubase life that prompts you to consider Nuendo? Or is this mainly wondering about the grass being greener.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |